<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Thoroughly Discredited (Part One)</title>
	<atom:link href="https://fittedin.org/fittedin/?feed=rss2&#038;p=1275" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://fittedin.org/fittedin/?p=1275</link>
	<description>The quest for justice</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Jan 2020 16:28:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.2.38</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Satish Sekar</title>
		<link>https://fittedin.org/fittedin/?p=1275#comment-1505</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Satish Sekar]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2018 15:38:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fittedin.org/fittedin/?p=1275#comment-1505</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That is not the same Michael Heath.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is not the same Michael Heath.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Satish Sekar</title>
		<link>https://fittedin.org/fittedin/?p=1275#comment-598</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Satish Sekar]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jan 2016 14:51:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fittedin.org/fittedin/?p=1275#comment-598</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This article was published in 2006 after it became clear that there was a serious problem with the way the CCRC&#039;s review of Heath&#039;s cases was conducted. It is telling that among the cases that the CCRC review refused to consider was a fire-related one. The murder convictions of three men was overturned - they had been referred back to the Court of Appeal by the CCRC, largely due to the dreadful pathology work conducted by Heath.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This article was published in 2006 after it became clear that there was a serious problem with the way the CCRC&#8217;s review of Heath&#8217;s cases was conducted. It is telling that among the cases that the CCRC review refused to consider was a fire-related one. The murder convictions of three men was overturned &#8211; they had been referred back to the Court of Appeal by the CCRC, largely due to the dreadful pathology work conducted by Heath.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
